FCC releases “Information Needs of Communities” report

Last week saw the release of the FCC’s report “Information Needs of Communities.” The report analyzes the current state of the media and concludes that “with the media landscape shifiting as fast as it has been, some current regulations are out of sync with the information needs of communities and the fluid nature of modern local medda markets.” Additionally, the report makes several specific policy recommendations aimed at helping to reduce the cost of reporting, enabling consumers, improving the media markets, removing obstacles to innovation, and ensuring taxpayer resources are well used.

The six broad recommendations from the report are:

1.) Information required by FCC policy to be disclosed to the public should, over time, be available online.

2.) Greater government transparency will enable both citizens and reporters to more effectively monitor powerful institutions and benefit from public services.

3.) Existing government advertising spending should be targeted more toward local media.

4.) Nonprofit media needs to develop more sustainable business models, especially through private donations.

5.) Universal broadband and an open Internet are essential prerequisites for ensuring that the new media landscape serves communities well.

6.) Policymakers should take historically underserved communitites into account when crafting strategies and rules.

While the report highlights gaps in local, community reported news, it also acknowledges the vast number of outlets and their continued exploration of business models. The report’s conclusion:

“the gaps are quite important, but they are fixable. In other words, we find ourselves in an unusual moment when ignoring the ailments of local media will mean that serious harm may be done to our communities – but paying attention to them will enable Americans to develop, literally, the best media system the nation has ever had.”

It remains to be seen what will become of the report, or the recommendations. But there’s no question that the media landscape is shifting rapidly and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. On behalf of our members and then industry, SIIA will continue to monitor the policy proposals and developments throughout this proces.

“The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly”

In the last few weeks, federal and state officials have introduced a plethora of plans and proposals with implications for education and the role of technology that is perhaps unprecedented in scale and scope.  The latest is the “National Broadband Plan: Connecting America” released today by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in response to a Congressional request in the Recovery Act a year ago.  The others: the National Education Technology Plan, titled “Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology” released two weeks ago,  the Obama Administration’s ESEA “blueprint for reform” and the NGA-CCSSO Common Core standards, not to mention the final Investing in Innovation (i3) rules.  The timing is largely coincidental.  The question: What does it all mean?

A few observations specific to education technology and SIIA members:

-The Obama Administration (including the independent FCC) seems to view technology as an important means to educating our students to maintain our global competitiveness.

- The Obama Administration is proposing a new federal policy path to realizing that goal, proposing to increase the E-Rate, eliminate targeted DoED funding through the Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) program, infuse technology in other ESEA programs, and look to “supply-side solutions” such as investment in open educational resources (OER) and interoperability as well as potentially far-reaching regulation around copyright, technology standards, etc.

- It is unclear whether the Obama Administration’s vision for transforming education through technology is a priority or sufficiently backed by “demand-side” targeted federal policies and investments (i.e., those directly supporting educational agencies and teachers around technology) needed to help lead the nation’s education system in this new direction.

- It is less clear how the U.S. Congress, not to mention education leaders, will react in that their actions are largely need to legislate and enact these policies and recommendations.  For example, “Many of the FCC’s proposals are short on details, and lawmakers and the agency can accept or reject any number of the ideas.”  [Read more...]

SIIA Files Comments in support of FCC Proposed “Open Internet Rules”

Today, SIIA came out in support of the Administration’s approach to “Network Neutrality” when it filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in favor of its proposed rule codifying 6 principles to “preserve the open Internet.”  In short, the goal is to preserve the level of open access over the Internet which has been critical the network’s success as an engine for creativity, innovation, and economic growth.

SIIA agrees with the FCC that without the guarantee of an open Internet that assures a level and transparent playing field for software and digital content providers, innovation and the development of new technologies and infrastructure will be significantly stifled.  Of course, this would not only be detrimental to the future of these industries, but also to consumers and business enterprise users, and the U.S. economy more broadly.

In its comments, SIIA identified two distinct risks that continued openness and transparency of the Internet faces from broadband network operators who have the technologies that allow them to distinguish different classes of traffic, to offer different qualities of services, and to charge different prices for each class.

First, there is the distinct risk that Internet access service providers may charge inefficiently high prices to content, application and other service providers that makes investing in innovative Internet content, application, and services risky.   Second, there is the real risk that, where service providers have market power, particularly relative to other services they offer, there is the incentive and ability to reduce or failure to increase transmission capacity or degrade service.   Where broadband Internet access service providers have market power and are vertically integrated or affiliated with content, application or service providers, it acts as a gatekeeper.

The proposed FCC rule provides an appropriate and carefully developed means to limit discriminatory actions by service providers that favor or disfavor content, applications or other services reaching end users, whether they be enterprises of consumers.  Importantly, the rule also provides sufficient flexibility for broadband providers to take reasonable measures to manage their networks or to address quality-of-service needs, and to provide a safe and secure Internet experience for their users, including blocking of spam, malware and the malicious traffic originating from malware.

As proposed by the FCC, the rules would not protect unlawful content, and not prevent reasonable broadband service provider practices to prevent the unlawful transfer of content, including actions to stop the unlawful distribution of copyrighted works—such unlawful distribution clearly has adverse consequence on the copyright industries, the economy and the overall broadband ecosystem.   SIIA strongly concurs with the FCC’s approach on this point.