House and Senate Committee leaders give positive signals on key tech policy issues

Last week, House Judiciary Sbcmte. Chair for IP, Competition and the Internet Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) made his priorities public. No real surprises, but it served as official confirmation that patent reform, copyright enforcement and net neutrality are at the top of the list. Not wasting any time, the Subcommittee will hold its first hearing on Patent Reform this Wednesday. Indeed, the new Committee structure instituted by new Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) was intended to grant a substantially greater focus on IP protection and Internet issues. As a founding leader of the Congressional Internet Caucus, Chairman Goodlatte is just the guy to champion many of these key issues to the benefit of innovation, e-commerce and job growth.

Meanwhile, the Senate Judiciary Cmte. priority list looks similar, with Chairman Leahy (D-VT) recently highlighting his priorities to include an even broader slate, adding revision of the electronic communications privacy (ECPA) law and wiretapping (CALEA) to patent reform and combating online copyright infringement and counterfeiting (COICA). In fact, the Senate Cmte. is moving even faster than its House counterpart by moving to consider draft patent reform legislation this Thursday.

Of course, we already knew that privacy would be on the front burner in the House and Senate Commerce Committees. That’s continuing to take shape as well. Recent reports continue to indicate that Sen. Kerry (D-MA) will lead on this, with hearings likely in mid-February and his draft legislation on the issue likely to be introduced in the near future. Importantly, Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), Chair of the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade, on Thursday sent a letter to her colleagues confirming her commitment to “work diligently” on the issue of privacy “both online and offline,” while also reiterating the complexity of the issue and her commitment to provide for “careful consideration and not ‘knee-jerk’ solutions.” Amen!

In all, while there are many issues Republicans and Democrats radically disagree on, some of these technology issues, like Patent reform and IP protection could possibly be in the right place, at the right time. Stay tuned.

For more SIIA policy updates, subscribe to the Digital Policy Roundup, SIIA’s weekly policy email newsletter.

SIIA Files Comments in support of FCC Proposed “Open Internet Rules”

Today, SIIA came out in support of the Administration’s approach to “Network Neutrality” when it filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in favor of its proposed rule codifying 6 principles to “preserve the open Internet.”  In short, the goal is to preserve the level of open access over the Internet which has been critical the network’s success as an engine for creativity, innovation, and economic growth.

SIIA agrees with the FCC that without the guarantee of an open Internet that assures a level and transparent playing field for software and digital content providers, innovation and the development of new technologies and infrastructure will be significantly stifled.  Of course, this would not only be detrimental to the future of these industries, but also to consumers and business enterprise users, and the U.S. economy more broadly.

In its comments, SIIA identified two distinct risks that continued openness and transparency of the Internet faces from broadband network operators who have the technologies that allow them to distinguish different classes of traffic, to offer different qualities of services, and to charge different prices for each class.

First, there is the distinct risk that Internet access service providers may charge inefficiently high prices to content, application and other service providers that makes investing in innovative Internet content, application, and services risky.   Second, there is the real risk that, where service providers have market power, particularly relative to other services they offer, there is the incentive and ability to reduce or failure to increase transmission capacity or degrade service.   Where broadband Internet access service providers have market power and are vertically integrated or affiliated with content, application or service providers, it acts as a gatekeeper.

The proposed FCC rule provides an appropriate and carefully developed means to limit discriminatory actions by service providers that favor or disfavor content, applications or other services reaching end users, whether they be enterprises of consumers.  Importantly, the rule also provides sufficient flexibility for broadband providers to take reasonable measures to manage their networks or to address quality-of-service needs, and to provide a safe and secure Internet experience for their users, including blocking of spam, malware and the malicious traffic originating from malware.

As proposed by the FCC, the rules would not protect unlawful content, and not prevent reasonable broadband service provider practices to prevent the unlawful transfer of content, including actions to stop the unlawful distribution of copyrighted works—such unlawful distribution clearly has adverse consequence on the copyright industries, the economy and the overall broadband ecosystem.   SIIA strongly concurs with the FCC’s approach on this point.