Measured Progress

 We are excited about our partnership with the InfoCommerce Group to produce DataContent 2012, coming up October 9-11 in Philadephia. Below is a blog post by Russ Perkins the founder of InfoCommerce Group. As we lead up to the conference, we will be highlighting posts from his blog which focus on the issues and topics we will be discussing at DataContent 2012. Enjoy!

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Monitoring what’s going on with online start-ups is not only a great way for me to identify interesting new data-driven products and new market opportunities, it’s also a touchstone for assessing how the publishing industry is doing relative to the best and brightest online innovators. Here are just three recent examples, each interesting to me in a different way. Read more

SIIA Member Spotlight: Crowd Fusion, The Agile Data Model

I had a chance to talk with Crowd Fusion’s CEO Brian Alvey to learn how Crowd Fusion uses an Agile Data Model to shake up the market and get customer’s sites and apps to market quickly and efficiently. Brian is also speaking at Content VIA Platforms  on May 10 in San Francisco where he will share experiences and war stories gained working on behalf of major publishers interacting with Apple, Facebook, Android and other platforms.

_____________________

Kathy: Hi Brian, tell us about your Crowd Fusion, what you do?

Brian Alvey, CEO, Crowd Fusion

Brian: Crowd Fusion is high-end multi-platform publishing software. These days publishers need to do more than ever, but they need to do it with tighter budgets. Crowd Fusion makes it easy to publish the same content to all the latest platforms and devices — all without expanding their production teams.

 

Kathy: Who are your customers?

Brian: Publishers and large brands. Our platform has been used by TMZ, Warner Bros/Telepictures, Myspace, The Daily, Essence and Best Buy’s Tecca.com.

 

Kathy: Tell is what is unique about Crowd Fusion?

Brian: We invented an agile data model that lets us and our customers get sites and apps to market faster and iterate more frequently.

 

Kathy: What are some unique challenges you’ve experienced at Crowd Fusion?

Brian: We work with high-end publishers and big media brands, so we’ve had to solve for 3 kinds of scale: traffic, content and workflow. One of our strengths is that our platform is cloud-native. Not only can you manage content in our CMS, you can also launch new servers and coordinate infrastructure all using a web browser — even on an iPad.

 

Kathy: What do you see as the biggest trends in the industry the next 12-18 months?

Brian: Tablet publishing. Multi-platform publishing. Mobile commerce.

 

Kathy:  What do you hope to get out of your SIIA membership?

Brian: Meeting people who face the same publishing and technology challenges we deal with.

 

Kathy: One thing the industry doesn’t know about you or others in your company?

Brian: We are a completely virtual company. We have no real office space. Our team works from home, Starbucks, customer offices, grandma’s house, wherever. We have 30 people and they are spread out across 18 U.S. states, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Italy.

 

Kathy: Whats the best way to contact you?

Brian: On Twitter: @crowdfusion or @brianalvey for me, Or by email: brian@crowdfusion.com.


Kathy Greenler Sexton is Vice President

Judge strikes down agreement between Google and publishers

It was a relatively slow news week for intellectual property. Perhaps that’s why Judge Denny Chen chose to issue his long-awaited decision in the copyright infringement case brought by book publishers against Google.

The publishers and Google had okayed a proposed agreement that would settle the suit, but the proposed settlement hit many bumps on the road. It had been revised substantially, and the final obstacle was the approval of Judge Chen of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

This obstacle proved to be insurmountable as Judge Chen issued a decision on Tuesday rejecting the proposed settlement when he concluded that it was not fair, adequate, or reasonable. The judge found that the settlement would grant Google both “significant rights to exploit entire books, without permission from copyright owners” and “a significant advantage over competitors, rewarding it for engaging in wholesale copying of copyrighted works without permission, while releasing claims well beyond those presented in the case.”

He suggested that the proposed agreement might be acceptable if it was based on a system that allowed copyright owners to “opt in” to the settlement instead of the present “opt out” approach. In sum, although Judge Chen recognized that the digitization of books and the creation of a universal digital library are beneficial, he concluded that the proposed settlement went too far.

Online subscription models: Will new Apple and Google plans woo publishers?

For those interested in selling premium electronic content, the week of Valentine’s Day this year was filled with hearts, flowers and, potentially, some candy boxes with pieces already missing. Recent back-to-back announcements by Apple and Google unveiled plans to support premium subscription sales, leaving many publishers surprised, puzzled and a little stressed out as to how to react to these offerings. Should they give these new plans a fat, wet kiss, blow kisses from afar, or send them back with a note saying “address unknown?” By week’s end, many publishers were still searching for the right reactions.

The problem that content publishers face with these plans is that they are in some ways quite radically different, both in their structure and their implications. The opportunities and stark choices that publishers face now are underscored most by Apple’s announcement of their subscription plan. Used so far only by Rupert Murdoch’s The Daily news app for Apple’s iPad and announced with no apparent preview to major media companies, the new Apple subscription plan seems to have been received by most publishers with a hushed surprise.

At its core the Apple plan is fairly simple, but not necessarily easy for media companies to stomach. Apple will take a 30 percent cut of all subscription revenues generated by sales through their iTunes app store, though publishers selling subscriptions through their own e-commerce services may sell apps and take 100 percent of the subscription revenues. However, if they do sell their subscriptions for apps outside of Apple’s e-commerce facilities, publishers must use their own technology to validate the subscription on Apple platforms. Moreover, from within a subscription-supported Apple app a publisher may not link to other content or offers outside of the app, and the pricing for the Apple subscription must be no more than any other subscription offer outside of the Apple e-commerce stores.

The economics of the Apple plan are restrictive enough in many ways, but even should publishers opt in to all of these requirements, there’s no guarantee that they’ll know who their subscribers are. Apple will release information about apps users obtaining content via a subscription only if they opt in to share it with them. For magazine publishers used to being able to share demographics with advertisers and marketers as one of the core of their marketing efforts, that tends to put a rather large chink in their typical expectations for media sales. [Read more...]

2011 SIIA Content CODiE Award winners announced at the Information Industry Summit

Bringing “On Demand” Another Step Forward for Publishing

Written by Gina Cerami, Director of Marketing, Connotate
Submitted by Connotate

The recent news about Xerox partnering with On Demand Books so that self-published pieces and public titles that are no longer available in the stores can be printed “on demand” via the Espresso Book Machine kiosk is very exciting. We’ve certainly come a step forward in our thinking (and technologies) if you can stroll over to a kiosk, search for the title of a book and push the print button to secure your own bound copy!

But wait, why aren’t we bringing this concept even another step forward? If we have the data, why aren’t we letting the consumer walk up to the kiosk and select specific chapters to combine and print. You might think that’s a silly idea but in the world of textbooks and offering a unique curriculum, this might be the perfect way to offer a well-rounded course of study.

Read the rest at: Connotate’s Business Intelligence Blog