Under: Education Policy
On Thursday, the House Appropriations Subcommittee for Labor-HHS-Education passed their appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2018 (FY18). The proposed bill would cut the federal education budget down to $66B – a reduction of $2.4B from FY17. While certainly better than President Trump’s $9.2B proposed cut, the FY18 House Proposal would make some dramatic changes.
Not included in this proposal is the President’s $1B public school choice program (FOCUS) or the $250M in state grants for private school choice. In fact, the Education and Innovation Research program which was the vehicle for the private school choice grants is eliminated entirely.
The bulk of the cut comes from the elimination of ESSA’s Title II program. A $2B program, Title II provides funding support for educator professional development, class size reduction, and educator recruitment and mentoring. This chart from the NEA shows the state-by-state impact of Title II elimination. Ano ...
After peaking at 10.8% during the height of the Great Recession, unemployment has steadily fallen to a new low of 4.3% percent this May, according to the most recent BLS report on the current employment situation. In fact, in some states like Colorado and Arkansas, unemployment has hit record lows of 2.3% and 3.4% respectively...
In 1975, Congress passed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) which mandated that schools provide special education services to students with disabilities. In exchange for requiring the provision of these services, the federal government committed to footing 40 percent of the costs. Since IDEA’s implementation though, the federal government has yet to fully fund this commitment. SIIA joined with 40 other national organizations in supporting legislation to commit Congress to closing the IDEA funding gap.
It is no secret that the cost of postsecondary education is high. Obtaining a Bachelor’s degree can cost an individual anywhere from $80,000 to $160,000 depending on the college or university – and that’s for students who graduate in four years. Unfortunately, less than half of students graduate in four years, and two more years of education only brings graduation rates up to 60%. For those students who do not finish their program of study, they leave an institution with no verifiable skills or credentials but have incurred significant debt – leaving them in a worse position to succeed than if they had chosen not to attend college. For universities, graduation rates matter too. Prospective students rely heavily on data like four-year graduation rates and year-to-year retention rates in their decision-making and state funding and continued participation in federal student financial aid programs for institutions depend on positive graduation and retention rates.&n ...
The President’s official budget proposal for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 was officially released yesterday. The proposal closely matches with an earlier version leaked to the Washington Post last week and provides all the details missing from the March “skinny budget.”
While education stakeholders have been preparing for deep cuts since the release of the skinny budget and last week’s sneak peak, the official release was still staggering. Education Department funding under the proposal would be slashed by $9.2B, or 13.5 percent, overall for FY18. The recent spending agreement for FY17 has the Education Department funded at $68.2B.
Cuts of this magnitude will be devastating for students, families, and schools who rely on a strong public education system to prepare children to be successful citizens and participants in the next generation workforce. For all of the focus and priority given to job training and economic development by President Trump, this proposal s ...
On Wednesday, the Washington Post obtained a leaked version of President Trump’s fiscal year (FY) 2018 education budget proposal. Set to be officially released next week, the proposal would, among other items, significantly reduce investments in skills training and adult basic literacy and eliminate ed tech investments under ESSA’s Title IV. The proposal would shift some of those funds to new investments in school choice, including expanding charting schools and vouchers for private and religious schools.
A government shutdown has been averted and the resulting agreement to fund the government through the end of fiscal year (FY) 2017 was nowhere close to President Trump’s proposal for FY2018. Title I will receive a net increase in funding by $100M and state grants for special education will go up $90M.
Disappointingly, the Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grant program under Title IV of ESSA received a staggeringly low appropriation of only $400M. In addition, the agreement would allow the funds to be distributed in a competitive manner from states to local districts. Established as a formula grant program of $1.6B when the law was passed, the low appropriation would be impractical to distribute entirely as a formula. Further provisions set the minimum competitive grant size at $10,000 and allow districts to use up to 25 percent for infrastructure activities – including hardware and software – which is an increase from the law’s 15 percent threshold.
Adding to our library of market analysis resources for members, The Education Technology Industry Network (ETIN) of SIIA is excited to announce the release of our latest education policy report — The Every Student Succeeds Act, Title I Summary & Analysis. ESSA’s Title I is the largest federal funding source for K-12 schools to improve the academic achievement of disadvantaged students.
I had the opportunity to join Larry Jacobs this morning on Education Talk Radio for a conversation on federal education policy. We talked about the Trump education budget proposal, the goings on at the US Department of Education, and what the Every Student Succeeds Act really means for states and schools.
Since President Trump released his “skinny budget,” which would slash $9.2B from the Education Department’s budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018, I’ve heard from many SIIA members wondering what the impact is going to be on schools. In short, the impact of the Trump budget on schools is nada. Nothing. This is a budget proposal and not an actual appropriations bill. Every year, the President puts out a budget proposal and every year it is ignored by appropriators in Congress as they develop the actual federal budget and appropriations levels.
We have already heard from leaders in Congress that President Trump’s proposal would have a steep climb on both sides of the aisle if it were ever to be seriously considered. Additionally, outside stakeholders on all sides of education have weighed in with varying levels of concern.
The proposal does however provide the most detailed window into the Trump Administration’s education priorities that we have had to date. So, what does it propose in order to reach $9.2B?